First congrats to the new forum!
So, reading everyday horror news about 0-day exploits in latest Java 1.7.0.10 and older ones, does it make sense and would it work to avoid trouble installing Java SE Runtime Environment 8.0 Build 72 Dev?
as everybody knows, Oracle spreads extremly slow updates and does'nt react.
I run your builds only on localhost to handle my collection (W7x64SP1), disconnected webservices for now.
what do think about that?
About JAVA
-
Madsonic
- Administrator
- Posts: 984
- Joined: 07 Dec 2012, 03:58
- Has thanked: 1201 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
Re: About JAVA
hi,
have download 1.8 and will test this next week with Madsonic, but generally Beta Software isn't better approved of error and exploits.
Read About Java Workarounds: http://blogs.computerworld.com/cybercri ... sible-java
best regards
have download 1.8 and will test this next week with Madsonic, but generally Beta Software isn't better approved of error and exploits.
Read About Java Workarounds: http://blogs.computerworld.com/cybercri ... sible-java
best regards
-
Madsonic
- Administrator
- Posts: 984
- Joined: 07 Dec 2012, 03:58
- Has thanked: 1201 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
Re: About JAVA
In generally the last Version (32/64bit), at the moment 1.7_17 for all systems (Windows, Linux, embedded)maxslug wrote:What version of Java do you recommend for a standalone server?
Best regards